AI Music Generation · Pricing comparison
AIVA vs Suno: Pricing
Suno is the cheaper option ($7/mo less), both offer a free plan, Suno rates slightly higher. Below we break down plans, free tiers, and value so you can decide which fits your budget and workflow.
Last checked July 24, 2026
At a glance
Suno is the cheaper option ($7/mo less), both offer a free plan, Suno rates slightly higher.
We may earn a commission if you subscribe through our links — at no extra cost to you.
AIVA vs Suno: side-by-side
| Feature | AIVA | Suno |
|---|---|---|
| Category | AI Music Generation | AI Music Generation |
| Pricing model | Freemium | Freemium |
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Free plan details | Free plan with MIDI export, non-commercial, attribution required. | Free: 50 credits/day (~10 songs), non-commercial use only. |
| Starting price | ~$17/mo (Standard, billed yearly) | $10/mo (Pro) |
| Highest known plan | ~$36/mo (Pro, full copyright) | $30/mo (Premier) |
| Free trial | No | No |
| Best for | Composers scoring films, games, and trailers | Creators who want finished songs with vocals, fast |
| Team support | No | No |
| API access | Yes | Yes |
| Editor rating | 4 / 5 | 4.5 / 5 |
Pricing and free plans
AIVA uses a freemium model, starting at ~$17/mo (Standard, billed yearly). Priced in EUR (€15/€33). Pro grants full copyright ownership — unique in the category. Its free plan: Free plan with MIDI export, non-commercial, attribution required.
Suno uses a freemium model, starting at $10/mo (Pro). Annual billing: Pro $8/mo, Premier $24/mo. Commercial rights start at Pro. Its free plan: Free: 50 credits/day (~10 songs), non-commercial use only.
Which is cheaper?
If budget is the deciding factor, Suno wins on entry price. If output quality or specific features matter more, weigh the feature lists below before deciding.
AIVA: pros and cons
Pros
- Only tool granting full copyright
- MIDI even on free plan
- Serious composition control
Cons
- Not for pop songs with vocals
- EUR pricing varies
- Smaller model advances
Suno: pros and cons
Pros
- Best vocal quality in category
- Cheapest commercial entry
- Built-in DAW on top tier
Cons
- Copyright litigation unresolved
- No copyright ownership guaranteed
- Audio-only export (no MIDI)
Who each tool is best for
- Best for beginners: Suno — lower barrier to entry and easier to start for free or cheaply.
- Best for teams: Either — both support teams.
- AIVA is best for: Composers scoring films, games, and trailers.
- Suno is best for: Creators who want finished songs with vocals, fast.
Our call
Verdict
On price alone, Suno is the value pick at $10/mo (Pro). Suno edges ahead on our editor rating. For most people, choose AIVA if you want composers scoring films, games, and trailers, and Suno if you want creators who want finished songs with vocals, fast.
AIVA vs Suno FAQ
Which is cheaper, AIVA or Suno?
Suno has the cheaper entry price — about $7/mo less. AIVA starts at ~$17/mo (Standard, billed yearly), while Suno starts at $10/mo (Pro).
Does AIVA or Suno have a free plan?
Both offer a free plan. AIVA: Free plan with MIDI export, non-commercial, attribution required. Suno: Free: 50 credits/day (~10 songs), non-commercial use only.
Is AIVA or Suno better for beginners?
Suno tends to be the easier starting point thanks to its pricing and free access, though both cover the same core ai music generation needs.
Which is better for teams?
Both support team use, so pick based on the specific features your team needs.