AI Music Generation · Pricing comparison
AIVA vs Udio: Pricing
Udio is the cheaper option ($7/mo less), both offer a free plan, Udio rates slightly higher. Below we break down plans, free tiers, and value so you can decide which fits your budget and workflow.
Last checked July 24, 2026
At a glance
Udio is the cheaper option ($7/mo less), both offer a free plan, Udio rates slightly higher.
We may earn a commission if you subscribe through our links — at no extra cost to you.
AIVA vs Udio: side-by-side
| Feature | AIVA | Udio |
|---|---|---|
| Category | AI Music Generation | AI Music Generation |
| Pricing model | Freemium | Freemium |
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Free plan details | Free plan with MIDI export, non-commercial, attribution required. | Free tier with limited daily credits. |
| Starting price | ~$17/mo (Standard, billed yearly) | $10/mo (Standard) |
| Highest known plan | ~$36/mo (Pro, full copyright) | $30/mo (Pro) |
| Free trial | No | No |
| Best for | Composers scoring films, games, and trailers | Musicians who care about output quality and licensing safety |
| Team support | No | No |
| API access | Yes | No |
| Editor rating | 4 / 5 | 4.1 / 5 |
Pricing and free plans
AIVA uses a freemium model, starting at ~$17/mo (Standard, billed yearly). Priced in EUR (€15/€33). Pro grants full copyright ownership — unique in the category. Its free plan: Free plan with MIDI export, non-commercial, attribution required.
Udio uses a freemium model, starting at $10/mo (Standard). Downloads restricted during the UMG-partnership transition — verify current status before buying. Its free plan: Free tier with limited daily credits.
Which is cheaper?
If budget is the deciding factor, Udio wins on entry price. If output quality or specific features matter more, weigh the feature lists below before deciding.
AIVA: pros and cons
Pros
- Only tool granting full copyright
- MIDI even on free plan
- Serious composition control
Cons
- Not for pop songs with vocals
- EUR pricing varies
- Smaller model advances
Udio: pros and cons
Pros
- Cleanest licensing trajectory
- Quality rivals Suno
- Loved by producers
Cons
- Downloads disabled during transition
- Feature velocity slowed
- Credit-to-song math unclear
Who each tool is best for
- Best for beginners: Udio — lower barrier to entry and easier to start for free or cheaply.
- Best for teams: Either — both support teams.
- Best if you need an API: AIVA offers API access where the other does not.
- AIVA is best for: Composers scoring films, games, and trailers.
- Udio is best for: Musicians who care about output quality and licensing safety.
Our call
Verdict
On price alone, Udio is the value pick at $10/mo (Standard). Udio edges ahead on our editor rating. For most people, choose AIVA if you want composers scoring films, games, and trailers, and Udio if you want musicians who care about output quality and licensing safety.
AIVA vs Udio FAQ
Which is cheaper, AIVA or Udio?
Udio has the cheaper entry price — about $7/mo less. AIVA starts at ~$17/mo (Standard, billed yearly), while Udio starts at $10/mo (Standard).
Does AIVA or Udio have a free plan?
Both offer a free plan. AIVA: Free plan with MIDI export, non-commercial, attribution required. Udio: Free tier with limited daily credits.
Is AIVA or Udio better for beginners?
Udio tends to be the easier starting point thanks to its pricing and free access, though both cover the same core ai music generation needs.
Which is better for teams?
Both support team use, so pick based on the specific features your team needs.